Jump to content

Adrian Pitt

Members
  • Posts

    146
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by Adrian Pitt

  1. I agree Colin 100% enforce the law and issue bigger fines, that is the only way it will ever be controlled. This never happened on this scale when was a kid growing up.
  2. All of this in a space of just 20-30 minutes is unbelievable, interesting to see as there is no real argument here, the camera does not lie.
  3. Well I am just venting my frustrations bobby, it is not right, and if a cyclist riding illegally on a footpath rides into me or my kids that is violent is it not? I understand that there is not enough infrastructure for cyclists but in fairness I have noticed when I travel about that a lot of towns and cities are slowly addressing this and it is not something that can happened overnight, nevertheless, many cyclist are just downright rude, selfish and cocky, I see this all the time and yes I know the same applies to motorists but the motorists does not windge and play the victim card. I didn't realise just how many people ride bikes on footpaths and flout the law to suit themselves until I started to read through this thread and now I cannot help but notice these people myself.
  4. I do not agree at all. The law is there for a reason, you cannot decide which laws you are going to abide by and which ones that you are not. A member on here has already said, how long before the person on a scooter/moped decides I don't feel safe on the road and decides to join the other illegal footpath riders? You talk as if the footpaths don't have pot holes, a lot of the time they are much worse than the roads themselves. I tell you what, if I am walking along the footpath and someone cycles too close towards me and my kids, I will be pushing them off! Lets see what they think about that. Clearly some idiots in these photographs and videos which frustrates me because I only have to just touch my mobile and I will get nicked, fined and issued a loads of points yet an uninsured unregistered cyclists can flout the law and nothing is done about it.
  5. Colin, you run Hereford Voice very well especially considering how many topics and discussion are on here. It is very easy to sit behind keyboards and criticise. Well done keep up the good work and thank you for providing this platform for all us members to be able to contribute to the various and sometimes controversial debates.
  6. A couple of good shots there Jamer, I am surprised they stood as long as they did lol
  7. Anything is better than empty shops but this does tick a few boxes for me I have to be honest. Nothing like treating oneself from time to time and Christmas is just around the corner so I might just have to have a peak.
  8. From what I have read and I might be wrong here but Colin thinks this is a scam because they have picked a day when they know the traffic will not be bumper to bumper, so this is not about road safety it is more about making a quick buck, once his wording SCAM.
  9. I agree with Colin, this is just a money making exercise because this road is normally choc-a-bloc with traffic so they have picked a day when they know there will be a lot less traffic about and looking to catch out the easy targets possibly driving 34mph. :Cha ching: :Cha ching: :Cha ching:
  10. PJ make a good pizza, good to see that shabby corner of Commercial Rd looking a lot more pleasant and brighter.
  11. And a MASSIVE earner for the UK, ten fold compared to what they are paid.
  12. Pictures look great, keep them coming! I do follow you on Instagram but also good to see them on the forums here.
  13. Happy days, the best result and so much deserved, good luck at Wembley.
  14. This was the result of the HT poll, which I didn't see until I read about it here, nevertheless, majority were in favour, even though the way it was worded could of been confusing to some, you had to click NO in favour of a tram and YES is you didn't want a tram and agreed with Councillor Price. Your vote Mooted proposals for a light tramway system to run along Hereford's Great Western Way have been ruled out by Herefordshire Council. Do you agree with this decision? Yes – it would cost too much and is not a viable transport solution 38% No – it would be a good, cost-effective way to link both sides of the city 58% I don’t know. 4%
  15. I have driven down here in the ice and it is not good, seriously, so I find this decision baffling to be honest.
  16. Surely not ha ha, I cannot imagine anyone using these to go into town or work, it needs to be a proper tram, does not need to be huge but it would need to accommodate wheelchairs and possibly buggies. This type could work
  17. A tram along the GWW would be ideal and most local people agree, a proper study should be done, (not work of old studies from years ago) which would also involve a tram company for their input and advice. I am sure local companies would sponsor carriages with advertising to create revenue and help fund the scheme.
  18. I am in total agreement with Steve on his comments here too.
  19. 2 young girls raped in Hereford and it did not make Central News? The images supplied of the man that the police would like to talk too are the usual poor quality that we often see on CCTV camera's. I wish the owners or these camera would occasionally clean the lenses of it is almost a pointless exercise. I really do hope that they catch the person who committed this disgusting crime and lock him up in general population with other prisoners for a long time.
  20. I share your opinion Unique, and I also believe people have a moral responsibilty to speak with friends/relatives and possibly even report, it would possibly save lives. Good debate though.
  21. Just ignore Paul or should I call you a knuckle dragging wing nut? Lmao
×
×
  • Create New...