Jump to content

Roger

Members
  • Posts

    2,231
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    57

Posts posted by Roger

  1. From what you have updated then the Council are not going to be enforcing anything in Belmont Court anytime soon. This obviously won't assuage your concern about dodgy parking at or near a private street where you live.

  2. Employee costs: £478,643 ...... That averages out at about 24 people being paid £20k each per year to manage the whole system. If everyone was paid the same. That is managers/enforcers/clerical. Sounds very dubious accounting to me. I would like to see a breakdown of those employee costs'. And what does 'support services' mean? Is that a manager salary moved into another column on the spreadsheet? Who knows!? 

  3. 56 minutes ago, ragwert said:

    Still in business

    Hardly my point. If the fine was fully paid .... Would The Council have made a net gain/loss? I think it is unsustainable to spend money for 11 months targeting one case. I think it was a worthy cause. I'm just questioning how sustainable the Model is? On the one hand you have the kitchen sink thrown at the case, on another hand you have team of people targeting revenue by chasing cigarette litter (New Street Station) .... It seems so unjoined up! 

  4. 11 hours ago, locallady said:

    Today a leaflet came through the door from Lib Dems. Says agreement regarding residents' parking permits could not be reached with residents of various roads. One of which was Belmont Court. It may not be common knowledge, but Belmont Court is privately owned by owners of properties in Belmont Court and is maintained by them, not the Council. Surely the Council have no rights in deciding parking there?

    Who is responsible for the road outside? Belmont Court is irrelevant. Or is it private parking spaces you're on about? 

  5. 2 hours ago, Ubique said:

    £29000 fine and costs , it would be interesting to know the breakdown of the fine and costs , as I recall,  it cost quite a bit to get the HGV and its load removed and sorted out . So,I hope that the Costs covered everything .

    having saud that wondering if nothing will be paid or will the Offending Company go into liquidation etc.

    This was always a case about 'liquid'! I agree with you. It is very unclear regarding the costs to The Council about the physical disposal of this oil waste. If, in theory, the fine was paid would the Council still be out of pocket? How much of the £29k fine would The Council see if it was ever paid? 

  6. 12 hours ago, ragwert said:

    Non for students Roger.There are a few electric car charging points and I think four disabled car park spaces.
    There is a large bike parking area for 80 cycles

    A fair few sixth form college students' have cars' at the existing campus. They dump them anywhere they can to get to lessons. We all know where! I would never accept that 6 car park spaces is feasible for a new build of that size. It (the build) buys into an aspiration of non car use. But that won't be the reality. We are nowhere near getting to a point where a car is redundant in Hereford. How many forum members' have ever seen a student frantically peddling up the cycle lane on Aylestone Hill to get to their lesson? It's the most underused cycle lane ever! An aspirational imposition that has never come close to achieving it's aim. 

  7. On 14/10/2018 at 13:01, Denise Lloyd said:

    Poor people who have had their homes flooded.  A lady from South Wales was being interviewed on the news last night she said she did not have insurance and didn't think any of the house holders in her road were covered either.  Buildings and contents is not that expensive couple of pound a week surely for your own piece of mind it should be one of your priorities.

    How is insurance a 'couple of pound' a week if you might get flooded? My insurance is more than £2 a week and I live on top of a hill. 

  8. International Food will reopen in due course. I suggest that a CSO should be permanently stationed outside when it does. The establishment [International Food] is trying, and mostly succeeding, in trying to have a laugh. It's been having a laugh for 8 years with a merry go round of stooges lined up to take a fall. WMP now need to go after the brains of the outfit. There will be several levels. But they [WMP] may only have time, and an inclination, to hit some low hanging fruit. They need to be targeting the 'Big Cheese'. 

  9. These people don't give a toss about our laws. I don't know what time the International Foods case was in court today but my 'informant' (who I have spoken to personally) went in there at 12.30 PM today and bought a pouch of illegal cheap tobacco. The shutters were then seen to come down at 1 PM. So they were kicking the arse out of it right until the bitter end. As suggested by Ubique it is a cast iron guarantee that these shops will carry on their operations using different methods. 

  10. Well ..... Where do you start on this one?  ..... WMP will bear all reasonable costs of the breakup . Warwickshire say £35M has been saved already due to the alliance. Bangham is saying the breakup will improve services in Herefordshire and Worcestershire (but the quote doesn't mention improvement for Shropshire). Apparently this improved service can be provided after the divorce payment to Warks has been made. A sort of Brexit Mark #2 ! 

  11. On 03/10/2018 at 18:27, Hereford Voice said:

    Zabka in Eign Gate and and International in Commercial Road were raided again today! 

    WMP have now issued a fairly comprehensive update on their website about the raids ~ with video's showing the sophisticated concealment methods at both shops. Also they report that a significant amount of 'out of date' food was found on the shelves at Zabka. Which could suggest that far from being a proper food shop it's primarily an illegal tobacco operation with just window dressing on the shelves to make it look like it's primarily a food shop. 

    • Like 1
  12. Quote

    4.  The Police and council can use closure powers under the Anti-Social Behavior, Crime and Policing Act 2014.  The powers mean a court case in the Magistrates - who can order a premises to be closed for up to 6 months. 

    I thought it was 3 months but it's fairly irrelevant as I've never heard of one being used in Hereford. If we focus on Zabka, a serial offence location, then who is the actual owner of the shop? Is it a Landlord? If so who is it? How long have they owned the shop? If the owner is a Landlord is it sufficient to get a new tenant in who has got a clean record and accept them at face value that they won't sell dodgy tobacco ~ when all the previous, similar, tenants did? All very unclear. There is woefully inadequate reassurance from the Police/Council that they are looking at the bigger picture. That they are looking at shop ownership. That they are looking to seek shop closures. Just busting the person at the bottom of the food chain every few weeks is not working. 

    • Thumbs Up 1
  13. 6 hours ago, Hereford Voice said:

    Zabka in Eign Gate and and International in Commercial Road were raided again today! 

    I'll take you at your word for that and will await the official press release. But this is very time consuming stuff. There seems to be a merry go round of raids and court cases ~ months down the line for the court result where the fine doesn't even dent the profits made between the raids. Then it's musical chairs shifting the next shop stooge in. There is no deterrent to hinder this activity! 

  14. 4 hours ago, Irena Sulecka said:

    I am sure you can all understand how frustrated I and my fellow Polish friends feel with these shops hiding behind the Polski Sklep sign feel, what is even more frustrating is that a lot of people think this shop owners are actually Polish, I mean do they really look Polish? Their name is often the giveaway. 

    The only Polish shop in Hereford, as far as I am aware is Edysia (red and white) at bottom of Eign Gate. I do not use any of the others.

    It has been pointed out many a time on this website that a Polish shop sign doesn't remotely mean that it's run/owned by by Polish people. The locals aren't fooled. The Police aren't fooled and the Council aren't fooled. There is a common theme when the next person fronted up to take the hit actually gets busted. They don't give a Hereford address to the Court. It's usually a Birmingham type address. So what we have is serious organised criminals operating a satellite operation in Hereford or Ross or wherever. They have either saturated the area where they've come from or they can't operate there because it's someone else's territory. It's a very similar business model to the illegal drug racket. 

×
×
  • Create New...