Cambo Posted October 20, 2016 Report Share Posted October 20, 2016 Just gave him a positive to even it out a little Thanks ragwert nice to know you got my back…but I can't take the risk of trying to giving you a plus mark thou sorry! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cambo Posted November 1, 2016 Report Share Posted November 1, 2016 Good news this PA is now not going before the planning committee as it's been refused by the planning officer by delegation after he spoke with the ward councillor who was happy enough for him to do so! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denise Lloyd Posted November 1, 2016 Report Share Posted November 1, 2016 Excellent news looks like they will have to have a rethink on this then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aylestone Voice Posted November 16, 2016 Report Share Posted November 16, 2016 Good news this PA is now not going before the planning committee as it's been refused by the planning officer by delegation after he spoke with the ward councillor who was happy enough for him to do so! Sorry. Council property and cannot be delegated to officers Now likely to be at Planning Committee on 7 December Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cambo Posted November 17, 2016 Report Share Posted November 17, 2016 Sorry. Council property and cannot be delegated to officers Now likely to be at Planning Committee on 7 December How is it that the council are not governed by the same rules as everyone else? However given the objections to this PA the committee would be foolish to push it through because it will not be the last they hear of it I'm sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aylestone Voice Posted November 29, 2016 Report Share Posted November 29, 2016 Report now online - recommendation by Planning Officer is for refusal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twowheelsgood Posted November 29, 2016 Author Report Share Posted November 29, 2016 Hmmmm, but will Councillors resist the smell of the filthy lucre on the table? Recent actions say perhaps not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aylestone Voice Posted December 7, 2016 Report Share Posted December 7, 2016 Planning Permission refused - only one Councillor voted against refusal Well done to all who got involved (including the Planning Officer) The decision did soften the blow of having to wait almost all day for the debate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twowheelsgood Posted December 7, 2016 Author Report Share Posted December 7, 2016 Well, that's very good news indeed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cambo Posted December 7, 2016 Report Share Posted December 7, 2016 Planning Permission refused - only one Councillor voted against refusal Well done to all who got involved (including the Planning Officer) The decision did soften the blow of having to wait almost all day for the debate Yes AV great result & the right one too even thou we had to waitI till last…have to say also cllr Greenow spoke well in support of refusing the PA which I have to admit was a pleasant surprise to me Also thanks to David Straker who did a grand job as commentator for the objectors Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denise Lloyd Posted December 7, 2016 Report Share Posted December 7, 2016 Well done I just came on here to ask what had happened and pleased to see this. As a matter of interest who was the Councillor who voted to refuse refusal might as well name and shame! I must admit Cllr Greenow comes out in strange places I know he was very supportive and very understanding of the objectors to the WHD development and spoke very well then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aylestone Voice Posted December 7, 2016 Report Share Posted December 7, 2016 So long as my information is correct the only Councillor who voted agianst refusal was Councillor Shaw who represents Bromyard Bringsty Ward. Odd you may think? However he is also a Cabinet Support Member for corporate strategy and finance - which may explain it But if I have his voting wrong then I apologise Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twowheelsgood Posted May 18, 2017 Author Report Share Posted May 18, 2017 I am reliably informed that this has not gone away - closed door discussions between a Council Director, Planning, the MOD and the Cathedral School have taken place. Given the MOD's involvement, it would seem that the TA is now included in the scope. There is a long standing hope/understanding that the TA site would be made available by the Council (they own it and lease it to the TA) for a new school to replace the present St James' School - in fact the school have been working hard on a feasibility study to this effect and it would be a terrible betrayal by the Council to pull the rug from under them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts