Jump to content

Alex

Members
  • Posts

    623
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    46

Posts posted by Alex

  1. 14 hours ago, Cambo said:

    First point I respect your opinion however that does not mean I have to accept your argument  as I do not & I would suspect you do not accept my side of the argument either?

    yes it is as anyone of voting age has the opportunity & right to do so except those I believe that are incarcerated? So those that decided not to vote for whatever reason should have no complaints at the outcome of any election or referendum as they unlike yourself did not take up there right to exercise that vote but you in doing so you should except the result regardless as you where happy enough to take part in the referendum.

    you say you except the system but yet you do not accept the result? So why take part in voting if your not willing to accept the outcome or is it just when it’s not to your liking? 

    i did say that & the proof I have is every time one of them opens their mouth a lie pops out you even said it yourself that both sides lied during the referendum campaign where they not mostly all politicians?

    well more fool Cameron then isn’t it for calling it in the first place regardless of his reasoning but he did call for it & you willing like many others took part in it with no complaints at the time from yourself or anyone else for that matter I suspect? happily in the knowledge no doubt that it would be a landslide for the remain camp but shock of horrors the British people turned round & stuck two fingers up to all the arrogant remainer’s & the EU who all thought they’d never lose the vote...but they did & that’s democracy whether you like it or not?

    if they are called I will try to organise protests outside polling stations but if you wish to exercise your right to vote then that is your free choice to which you have ever right to do so as I do too have the right to peaceful protest against.

    again your 100 people in a room argument is floored as those 100 people in a room who do not exercise their free right to cast a vote that is there own fault so should have no complaints at the outcome neither those who voted against the result either as it just shows that they where unable to garner enough votes to swing the outcome in their favour.

     

     

    Well put that person

    • Like 1
    • Thumbs Up 1
  2. 19 hours ago, Tom Smith said:

    Typical Tory response from Rone and also Phil Edwards supposed Independent who said pedestrians would be killed if lights turned off.

    Please dont vote for these numpties May 2nd

    Is this not the very same council that filled in the subway near Tesco in the city and are now contemplating closing the other one at the top of the new bridge..replacing them with even more lights! 

    Virtually everyone locally knows that when the lights are out that the traffic congestion disappears, people have passed their tests, I think they need to give the motorists a little my credit. 

    They complain about pedestrians being able to cross the road (I appreciate that turning off the lights does not mean turning of the pedestrian lights) but do noting about the constant danger of cyclists riding on the footpaths, like someone has already said, it is either because this whole idea of turning off the traffic lights and the idea of a tram system along the GWW derived from Colin here on Hereford Voice or it is simply down to the fact that it is not their idea, which is often the case with councillors. They need to look outside the box and give these ideas serious consideration.

  3. On 28/09/2018 at 08:06, greenknight said:

    Well hello...it's been a while but I'm liking the revamp.

    Been away with work and doing a bit of my own rebuilding and I guess that brings me to the topic in question.

    Does anyone know what's going on in the fields next to the Barrett new development and opposite the road that leads out from the old Herefordshire Nature Trust building ?

    Good to see you back. 

  4. I assume that this is the same thing? 

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/dangerous-cycling-new-legislation-death-criticised-kim-briggs-uk-a8487701.html

    Cyclists should be treated no different to any other road user (or in many cases footpath users), some cyclists travel at very high speeds, not in comparison to cars but within the city limits it is often the same if not more, why should they be treated any different ?  

×
×
  • Create New...