Jump to content

Aylestone Voice

Members
  • Posts

    628
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    26

Posts posted by Aylestone Voice

  1. Well Bridgen is a bit of a bore. But it is not just YouTube or the government that is controlling what we choose to say online

    If you post comments on Hereford Voice Facebook page which not in line with the owners views then you will get banned. But I guess that if I was running a business page I would quite happily ban someone who posted views I did not agree with

    So Bridgen, just like I have, should suck it up and move on.

  2. The Council have secured a total of some £25m from various sources but they need someone to deliver it. So this is what they do:-

    "To award a contract to AECOM Limited to provide professional services support for the design and delivery of the LUF programme at a forecast cost of £765,539 and to assign £154,000 of the LUF Programme Contingency and Risk allowance to this contract."

    Link - https://councillors.herefordshire.gov.uk/documents/s50112338/Professional Services Support for the Hereford Levelling Up Funding LUF Programme.pdf

     

  3.  

    This is what OFSTED concluded in their letter:-

    Headline findings

    Since the last inspection, when services were judged to be inadequate, leaders have recognised the scale of improvement and are in the process of implementing a wideranging improvement plan. Practice is starting to improve and positive progress is being made with some families. However, the quality and effectiveness of practice with children in need and those subject to a protection plan remain variable. The achievement of more consistently effective practice is hampered by several issues. These include continued high turnover of social workers, a legacy of some families with chronic long-term needs who have experienced poor practice over several years, closure of children’s cases to social care before sustained change has been achieved, leading to increased re-referrals, and management support which is not yet consistently effective. 

    So is Daryyl going to comment on the last phrase?

    • Frustrated 1
  4. 1 hour ago, twowheelsgood said:

    This would be unbelievable, but under the present administration is par for the course. How does a short section of kerb amount to 690m2? And £1.3 million? That's £1884m2 - that's a new build house rate. It's all utter madness, and with our money. 

    It seems that they propose raising the whole length of the carriageway from Cosy Club to High Town to the current level of the pavement

    And 16 weeks of disruption to the businesses

    OK it is using some grant cash but this could surely be better value used elsewhere?

    I'm not sure if I should add the decision to increase costs in St Owens Street - but hey ho!

    https://councillors.herefordshire.gov.uk/documents/s50105171/Commissioning works to progress the St Owen Street cycle contraflow as part of the Hereford City Cen.pdf

    Boom! £1,173,934.70

  5. Perhaps the Police should have a strong talk with the Council.  

    The lack of maintenance along footpaths in the City is frankly shocking. You only have to look at the photo above - overhanging trees (which may well meet the green council's agenda) but which at night make the path even darker and unsafe. 

    Elsewhere paths have significant overgrown vegetation (e.g. Union Walk) and where there are lights many of these are obscured by vegetation (e.g. Great Western Way just south of Sainsburys). 

    All of this gives those people who want to cause harm places to hide and then prey on the vulnerable. It also encourages people not to use these paths due to fear.

    But the Council, if even they offer warm words about this, don't care. As with the police statement we will get some oft repeated  crap that "we are working with our partners (the most overused wet excuse from public bodies) to ... etc" 

    None of this is meant to excuse in any way those who carry out these crimes.

    • Thumbs Up 1
  6. Are the Police requiring the Council to do something urgently about the state of paths in the City. The lighting is very poor and many paths have significant overgrown vegetation (I guess this bit meets the Council's green agenda)

    For example Union Walk for one

    How can people feel safe walking or cycling when the paths are dark and dingy with so many places where potential aggressors can hide

  7. 6 hours ago, twowheelsgood said:

    After decades of neglect, I doubt £25k is going to make any dent at all, especially at BBLP's rates (and standards of work).

    You missed this bit - An analysis is currently being commissioned to determine the best course of action to deal with this problem 

    The consultants will probably take most if not all of the £25K

×
×
  • Create New...