I support the policy to encourage different modes of transport,I walk to work, but there needs to be a robust transfer plan and infrastructure in place to support it. Meadow Park is basically a rural housing estate, it is not in the city centre, people who live there will have cars as will their visitors. The estate is not on a bus route. The nearest bus route is probably a mile away. If thetlre is a bus to catch with the timetable cuts? The site has very few pavements and no streetlighting at all. The same can be said for Attwood Lane, which is dangerous ro walk on at rush hour. Or in the dark. This does nothing to encourage pedestrians or cyclists, especially young families for whom the estate was built for ( 12 houses are housing association). The train station is several miles away. Where are the cycle paths? If the council genuinly wanted to discourage the car at this estate, they should have had a joined up transport plan to go with it. This site has been planned and built from scratch. These things should have been put in place to support it. It looks like the 2.2 space rule has been applied here, but something has gone wrong as we live in a 3 bed and have 2 spaces, fine with us( if we could get to them), but there are several 4 beds on the estate with 1 parking space and a garage( which is too snall to park in). All 4 beds will have 2 cars or more, where are there visitors to park? Where is the sense in planning like that? I can only assume greed has driven the decision to squeeze as many houses as possible on to a small site.