Jump to content
Bill Thomas

HC Made £1.9 Million Profit From Parking Charges!

Recommended Posts

HEREFORDSHIRE Council made £1.9 million profit in car parking charges in 2013/14 - more than £300k than the previous year.

 

post-157-0-21425100-1418469837.jpg
 
In figures released by the RAC Foundation, Herefordshire Council was 89th out of 353 authorities in the amount it made from parking tickets, permits and penalties.
 
It collected £1,880,000 in the last tax year compared to 1,563,000 in 2012/13.
 
Overall in 2013/14 councils in England made £667 million from their day to day, on and off street parking operations. After capital charges the net surplus was £549 million.
 
By law any surplus must be used for transport projects.
 
The figures are taken from an RAC Foundation report - based on financial returns sent from local councils to the government
 
While some of the increase in surplus is down to rising income, there is also evidence many councils are cutting operating costs.
 
The authority with the largest surplus in 2013-14 was, once again, Westminster with £51 million.
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm one of those dumb knights who parks his stead only to realize that he does not have the correct change paying over the odds once again for his bit of turf. I kick myself and the horse every time but I'm not bothered ...but this will change particularly if the money is reinvested into crazy projects such as the suggested grief road....sorry southern relief road.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm, I don't think building a relief road classifies as public transport.

 

HT says 'By law any surplus must be used for transport projects' - I take it that doesn't specifically mean public transport. That would exclude for instance, cycle paths, pedestrian routes - you know, the things that were promised as part of the relief road proposal at consultation stage and then deleted, along with bus lanes and more. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"They" have been building a cycle track alone the Roman Rd from the Starting Gate East towards Worcester for a distance of approx. 800m . It appears to have taken " them " at least 6 weeks to date , oh ! and it's not finished yet . As a layman let me tell you what they are doing , " they " are wideing the footpath which runs alone the Wiggins business by about 18 inches. You might ask if since they started work have I seen a cyclist using the Roman Rd. Eh ! NO ......so it appears to me , a layman who gave up cycling a few years ago that it's a complete waste of money - previously cyclist used the footpath at no harm to themselves or the non existent

Pedestrians - money wasted in my mind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What it defined as public transport because most of this is in private hands e.g. buses.The council has been making this profit for a while but it hasn't stopped the axe falling on many rural bus routes. So what else is there...railways. Well that's in another forum. Perhaps we should subsidize taxis!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"They" have been building a cycle track alone the Roman Rd from the Starting Gate East towards Worcester for a distance of approx. 800m . It appears to have taken " them " at least 6 weeks to date , oh ! and it's not finished yet . As a layman let me tell you what they are doing , " they " are wideing the footpath which runs alone the Wiggins business by about 18 inches. You might ask if since they started work have I seen a cyclist using the Roman Rd. Eh ! NO ......so it appears to me , a layman who gave up cycling a few years ago that it's a complete waste of money - previously cyclist used the footpath at no harm to themselves or the non existent

Pedestrians - money wasted in my mind.

It would of been a better idea to have put an extra lane in here for vehicles and put the cycle lane on the other side of the road.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It would of been a better idea to have put an extra lane in here for vehicles and put the cycle lane on the other side of the road.

 

Different pots of money - different departments - different egos - same lack of joined up thinking, same box ticking, same spending money for the sake of it, just to get more next year. Repeat annually, return some years later, dig up and build something different.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They put in cycle lanes where its easy to do so, not where its needed, that way they can impress central govt. With how many miles of cycle track they have laid.

 

Honestly with all these cuts that are happening its cuts to bus services that has me most concerend, I'm really anxious about it. My wife cannot drive, never will be able too, if the buses go we will have to move house.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Apcoa, a German company that issues parking tickets for local authorities, has been accused of being “incentivised†to fine motorists under its contractual arrangements with one of the country’s biggest councils. 
 
A contract between Apcoa and Gloucestershire County Council, released under the Freedom of Information Act, shows that Apcoa is paid “a fixed sum†of £2 for each penalty charge notice (PCN) that is “closed and fully paidâ€. Apcoa denies this is an incentive and says the fee covers administration costs. 
 
Campaigners and MPs are now demanding to know if this payment structure is applied elsewhere and with other contractors to the public sector. Apcoa, which describes itself as the “UK’s leading provider of tailored parking solutionsâ€, works in more than 150 locations across the country, providing security and issuing tickets for councils and businesses. 

 

Another good example of privatisation in action. This company is not operating in car parks in Herefordshire - yet!

Edited by megilleland

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to bring you up to date.

image.png

The use of surplus funds

The use of any surplus funds is governed by Section 55 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, as amended by Section 95 of the Traffic Management Act 2004, this states that any surplus in parking revenue accounts, after the cost of running the schemes has been covered can be spent on:

* Providing additional parking facilities

* Public transport schemes

* Highway improvements

* Road maintenance

* Environmental improvements

Income that the council receives from car parking does not have to be 'ring-fenced' for spending in the areas detailed above. The surplus in 2017/18 contributed towards highways and transport services costs.

Edited by megilleland

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Employee costs: £478,643 ...... That averages out at about 24 people being paid £20k each per year to manage the whole system. If everyone was paid the same. That is managers/enforcers/clerical. Sounds very dubious accounting to me. I would like to see a breakdown of those employee costs'. And what does 'support services' mean? Is that a manager salary moved into another column on the spreadsheet? Who knows!? 

Edited by Roger

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×